Consistency Rule Prop Firm: How It Works
What a prop firm consistency rule is, how it is calculated, what the 20%, 30% and 40% versions mean, which firms have none, and how to pass one.
Independently ranking 16 futures prop firms
Every ranking is built from a single verified data record. Transparent scores across 16 evaluated firms with no guesswork, no paid placements.
As Seen On






FundedNext Futures leads on 88/100, ahead of FXIFY Futures (88) and Blueberry Futures (85), across all 16 futures prop firms we track. Scores come from verified data, and change only when a firm's data does.
See all rankingsScores are produced by our published methodology. See the full rankings for every firm we track.
Sorted by our score, filter and search below
Search by firm name, filter by evaluation type, broker backing or active offer, and sort by BPF Score or rank. All 16 futures prop firms stay on the page — nothing is hidden behind pagination.
| Country | Profit split | Challenge from | Platforms | Promo | Review | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 ![]() | 88 Excellent out of 100 | AE | 90% | $79.99 | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView | 10% OFF | Read Review Visit FundedNext Futures |
2 ![]() | 88 Excellent out of 100 | IE | 100% | $89 | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader | 15% OFF | Read Review Visit FXIFY Futures |
3 ![]() | 85 Great out of 100 | AU | 90% | $129 | BlackArrow | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Blueberry Futures |
4 ![]() | 82 Great out of 100 | IL | 80% | $59 | BlackArrow | No Offer - | Read Review Visit The5ers Futures |
5 ![]() | 80 Good out of 100 | GB | 90% | $79 | AlphaTrader, NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, WealthCharts, Deepcharts | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Alpha Futures |
6 ![]() | 73 Fair out of 100 | US | 80% | $150 | NinjaTrader, Finamark, Rithmic | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Earn2Trade |
7 ![]() | 72 Fair out of 100 | US | 100% | $80 | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, ATAS, Volumetrica, Volsys/Volbook | No Offer - | Read Review Visit MyFundedFutures |
8 ![]() | 72 Fair out of 100 | US | 100% | $65 | NinjaTrader, R|Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, ScalpTool, Volfix.net, Agena Trader, Bookmap, Jigsaw Trading, MultiCharts, Medved Trader, Track 'n Trade, Trade Navigator, MotiveWave, InsideEDGE Trader, Vetta, iTrader, Order Flow Trading, Photon Trade | No Offer - | Read Review Visit One Up Trader |
9 ![]() | 70 Fair out of 100 | US | 95% | $87 | NinjaTrader, Tradovate | No Offer - | Read Review Visit TradeDay |
10 ![]() | 70 Fair out of 100 | US | 90% | $139 | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Tradeify |
11 ![]() | 68 Below Avg out of 100 | US | 100% | $40 | Match-Trader, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, E8 Futures Platform, Tradovate | No Offer - | Read Review Visit E8 Markets |
12 ![]() | 61 Poor out of 100 | US | 100% | $118 | Rithmic, Tradovate, WealthCharts, NinjaTrader, RTrader Pro | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Apex Trader Funding |
13 ![]() | 57 Poor out of 100 | US | 90% | $49 | TopstepX, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Tradovate, Quantower, T4 | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Topstep |
14 ![]() | 51 Poor out of 100 | LI | 80% | $49 | cTrader, NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, Quantower, ATAS, Volsys, Volumetrica, TradingView | No Offer - | Read Review Visit The Trading Pit |
15 ![]() | 48 Poor out of 100 | US | 100% | $16.50 | TradingView, NinjaTrader, Tradovate, R | Trader Pro, EdgeProX, Sierra Chart | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Elite Trader Funding |
16 ![]() | 39 Poor out of 100 | AE | 100% | $99 | Project X, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Volumetrica, Volsys, ATAS, TradingView, VolBook, Tradovate | No Offer - | Read Review Visit Goat Funded Futures |
Every figure in this table is taken from each firm’s own published challenge terms, payout policy and fee schedule, cross-checked against its Trustpilot profile for the trust component. Last verified . 2 of the 16 firms currently carry a verified discount code. Scores are produced by our published methodology.
We track 16 futures prop firms in this ranking, of which 16 carry a full score. FundedNext Futures leads on 88/100, ahead of FXIFY Futures on 88/100 , with the lowest scored firm at 39/100. Scores come from seven weighted criteria - challenges, spreads, markets, payouts, platforms, trust and support - applied identically to every firm, with no paid placement.
Entry pricing starts at $16.50 for the cheapest evaluation we list. Profit splits reach 100% at the top of the table. The fastest first payout on record is 1 day after funding. 1 of these firms offers an instant funding route that skips the evaluation entirely. 2 carry a verified discount code.
Platform coverage is widest on NinjaTrader (13 firms), Tradovate (12 firms) and TradingView (9 firms). Check platform support before rules or pricing: a favourable rule set on an execution platform you dislike is a bad trade.
Buyer's guide
Futures evaluations are priced and risk-managed differently from forex challenges. These five attributes decide the outcome, and each is scored on every firm in the table above.
This is the single biggest difference between futures firms. An end-of-day trailing drawdown recalculates from your closing balance; an intraday trailing drawdown follows your unrealised equity high tick by tick and can close an account on an open position that later recovers. Two firms quoting the same drawdown figure can be far apart in practice.
Futures accounts cap how many contracts you may hold at once, and often apply a lower cap during the evaluation than after funding. The cap governs how much size you can express per idea, so read it alongside the profit target rather than on its own.
Trading CME, CBOT, NYMEX and COMEX products requires exchange market-data subscriptions, and round-turn commissions apply per contract. Both are recurring costs on top of the evaluation fee, and they are what make a cheap monthly account more expensive than it looks.
Futures firms commonly apply consistency rules that cap what share of total profit a single day may contribute, and hold the first payout behind a minimum number of winning days. A fast headline payout cycle means little if a consistency rule delays your eligibility.
Futures platforms differ more than forex ones: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic and Quantower each expose different order types, DOM behaviour and automation support. Confirm the firm supports the platform and data feed you already trade before comparing anything else.
Connect with thousands of prop firm traders inside our Discord. Get real-time deal alerts, verified payout proof, firm rule changes as they happen, and honest discussion about which challenges are actually worth taking - all in one place, and free to join.
traders already in the community
Join DiscordOur Process
We read the firm's official terms, challenge rules, payout policies, and T&Cs. All data sourced directly with no third-party aggregators.
Each firm is scored across 7 categories: challenges, spreads, markets, payouts, platforms, trust and support. Challenges and payouts carry the heaviest weights because they decide what you pay and what you take home; support weighs least.
Data stored in one canonical record. Every metric on every page flows from that source with no duplicated values, no stale data.
Who's Behind the Scores
Justin Grossbard
CEO & Co-Founder
Co-founder of CompareForexBrokers with 10+ years covering brokers and prop firms. Leads the CFD review lane.
Noam Korbl
COO & Co-Founder
Co-founder of BestPropFirms and CompareForexBrokers. Leads the futures and payouts review lanes.
Read more about the team on our about page.
Got Questions?
Everything you need to know about prop trading firms and how we rank them.
From The Blog
Guides and explainers on how prop firms actually work, written against the same verified data as our rankings.
What a prop firm consistency rule is, how it is calculated, what the 20%, 30% and 40% versions mean, which firms have none, and how to pass one.
What a prop firm daily loss limit is, how it is calculated, whether it uses balance or equity, which firms have none, and how to avoid breaching it.
Static, end-of-day trailing and intraday trailing drawdown explained, with worked examples showing how each type decides whether an account breaches.